I'll agree with this reviewer, who voices some disappointment that the theme of grace seems mostly passive and might have been portrayed with more complexity (i.e., grace in the form of a courageous self-giving). However, it is not like the portrayal is shallow. We see the tension in the characters themselves, and even see the two most willful characters come to a point of confession between them. We see both the beauty and horror of nature -- with the former writ large and the latter haunting the whole -- like a National Geographic film except with a full dose of self-consciousness about the questions of meaning. When it comes to the human narrative I suppose I was wishing for was a truer picture of the (seemingly foolish) courage of grace. But I suppose one can't fault a film for not having a full-blown Christ figure. In fact, if it had one, we might be criticizing it for spoon-feeding us instead of leaving us with the longing. Perhaps what the reviewer is on to -- the concerting thing about the film -- is that it is so realistic; nature does always seem to have the upper hand. But even with its harder edges, it looks gorgeous.
For me this film was an 8/10 (which for me means it was very good), and I wouldn't fault anyone for giving it full marks.
2 comments:
We're launching a quarterly film and faith discussion event at our church next month, beginning with this film. Pretty excited about it.
I was helped by someone pointing out the significance of the Job quote at the beginning of the film where God finally answers Job pointing to the vastness and complexity of creation for pointing toward the purpose of the movies quite long exploration of that theme.
Yeah. I think there is a lot of potential here for discussing the fact that "grace" - when defined from within nature and without revelation - is always going to come up short. In a sense, for all the marvel of nature, on its own it can't even begin to give us the marvel of grace.
Post a Comment